Some questions to consider.
Professor Brian Butler
December, 2003
These questions cover
the final sections of the course in which we are dealing with criticisms or
objections to the CRUM hypothesis. You
should be familiar with chapter nine and, to a much lesser extent, with chapters
ten, eleven and twelve.
- Antonio Damasio, an internationally renown
neuroscientist claims that Descartes’s error ( the title of a book by
Damasio) is that Descartes did not appreciate the value of emotions for
consciousness and thinking. How would
we incorporate similar information for an intelligent machine?
- Consider the problem of emotions in
chapter nine. Is it a problem
concerning emotion as information about a mental state or is it a
problem of emotion as motivation that focuses on a particular goal?
- You go to party and meet this really
attractive person who is heavily into the arts. When you mention you’re studying cognitive science they
immediately point out that no computer could ever write poetry or paint a
picture. How would you
respond? Why?
- In chapter eleven, Sir Roger Penrose makes
it clear that he does not believe that a computer could ever discover
anything new in mathematics. Would
you agree? Why?
- In Consciousness Explained, Daniel
Dennett claims that John Searle seriously misguides us with his analogy of
the Chinese Room by ignoring the fact that the program that speaks Chinese
must be an “extraordinarily supple, sophisticated, and multilayered
system, brimming with ‘world-knowledge’ and meta-knowledge and
meta-meta-knowledge about its own responses, its own ‘motivations’ and the
motivations of its interlocutor, and much, much more.” (Dennett, 1991,
page 438). Evaluate the strength
of Searle’s argument from this perspective.
- Patricia and Paul Churchland are two
philosophers who accept the idea that we are really “neural networks” and
nothing more. How does this
perspective help refute the question Searle asks about “what understands
Chinese?” in the Chinese Room?
- What is a qualia? Could a computer that passes the Turing
Test ever experience a qualia?
What does David Chalmers think?
- Chalmers claims that your skull may not
represent the limit of your mind and argues for a concept he calls the
‘extended mind’. What does this
mean?